EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-502/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Munich v EUIPO — Tone Watch (MUNICH10A.T.M.) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — European Union word mark MUNICH10A.T.M. — Earlier EU and national figurative marks MUNICH — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity of the goods and services — No aesthetic complementarity — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Rights of the defence)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0502

62020TA0502

June 22, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

16.8.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/10

(Case T-502/20) (*)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - European Union word mark MUNICH10A.T.M. - Earlier EU and national figurative marks MUNICH - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity of the goods and services - No aesthetic complementarity - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) - No damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Rights of the defence)

(2022/C 311/13)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Munich, SL (La Torre de Claramunt, Spain) (represented by: M. del Mar Guix Vilanova, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Acting as agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Tone Watch, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. López Martínez, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 March 2020 (case R 2472/2018-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between the applicant and the intervener.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Munich, SL to pay the costs.

(*) Language of the case: Spanish.

(1) OJ C 329, 5.10.2020.

ECLI:EU:C:2022:140

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia