- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-251/19: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Wieland-Werke v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Market for rolled products and pre-rolled strip made of copper and copper alloys — Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement — Commitments — Relevant market — Assessment of the horizontal and vertical effects of the transaction on competition — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of good administration — Rights of the defence)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0251
62019TA0251
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 284/23
(Case T-251/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Competition - Concentrations - Market for rolled products and pre-rolled strip made of copper and copper alloys - Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement - Commitments - Relevant market - Assessment of the horizontal and vertical effects of the transaction on competition - Manifest error of assessment - Principle of good administration - Rights of the defence)
(2022/C 284/27)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Wieland-Werke AG (Ulm, Germany) (represented by: U. Soltész, C. von Köckritz and K. Winkelmann, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Berghe, A. Cleenewerck de Crayencour, M. Farley and F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 922 final of 5 February 2019 declaring a concentration to be incompatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement (Case M.8900 — Wieland/Aurubis Rolled Products/Schwermetall).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Wieland-Werke AG to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.