I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2016/C 068/47)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: The Art Company B & S, SA (Quel, Spain) (represented by: L. Sánchez Calderón and J. Villamor Muguerza, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Manifatture Daddato SpA (Barletta, Italy), Sabina Laurora (Trani, Italy)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘SHOP ART’ — Application for registration No 12 030 921
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 October 2015 in Case R 3050/2014-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.