EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-249/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 November 2021 — European Commission v UG (Appeal — Civil service — Contract staff — Contract of indefinite duration — Termination — Grounds for termination — Distortion — Non-material damage — Admissibility — Failure to rule on a head of claim)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CA0249

62020CA0249

November 25, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

31.1.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/9

(Case C-249/20 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Appeal - Civil service - Contract staff - Contract of indefinite duration - Termination - Grounds for termination - Distortion - Non-material damage - Admissibility - Failure to rule on a head of claim)

(2022/C 51/10)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: UG (represented by: initially by: M. Richard and P. Junqueira de Oliveira, subsequently by: M. Richard, avocats)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 2 April 2020, UG v Commission (T-571/17, not published, EU:T:2020:141) in so far as it annulled the European Commission’s decision of 17 October 2016 to terminate UG’s contract of employment of indefinite duration, found the existence of an illegality capable of giving rise to that institution’s liability and rejected as inadmissible UG’s head of claim seeking compensation for her non-material damage;

2.Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

3.Reserves the costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 348, 19.10.2020.

* * *

Language of the case: French

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia