I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-304/09)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark BASmALI - Earlier non-registered trade mark and earlier sign BASMATI - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2012/C 58/12
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Tilda Riceland Private Ltd (Gurgaon, India) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, N. Urwin and D. Sills, Solicitors)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Siam Grains Co. Ltd (Bangkok, Thailand) (represented by: C. Thomas-Raquin, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 March 2009 (Case R 513/2008-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Tilda Riceland Private Ltd and Siam Grains Co. Ltd.
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 19 March 2009 (Case R 513/2008-1);
2.Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay two thirds of the costs incurred by Tilda Riceland Private Ltd;
3.Orders Siam Grains Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay one third of the costs incurred by Tilda Riceland Private Ltd.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 244, 10.10.2009.