- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-31/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 September 2011 — Pino v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appointment — Article 5(2) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Internal competitions for transfer from one category to another published before 1 May 2004 — Candidate appearing on the reserve list before 1 May 2006 — Grading — Application of a multiplication factor of less than 1 — Loss of promotion points)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62006FA0031
62006FA0031
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.11.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 340/34
(Case F-31/06)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Staff case - Officials - Appointment - Article 5(2) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Internal competitions for transfer from one category to another published before 1 May 2004 - Candidate appearing on the reserve list before 1 May 2006 - Grading - Application of a multiplication factor of less than 1 - Loss of promotion points)
2011/C 340/67
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Marco Pino (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by J. Currall and H. Krämer, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented, initially, by M. Arpio Santacruz and M. Simm, and subsequently by M. Bauer, J. Monteiro and K. Zieleśkiewicz, acting as Agents)
Re:
Annulment of Commission decisions appointing the applicants, officials in Category B and successful candidates in an internal competition for change of category, in administrative posts, in so far as they determine the applicants’ grading pursuant to Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations, maintain the application to their remuneration of a multiplication factor and reset their promotion points at zero.
Operative part of the judgment
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Each party is ordered to bear its own costs.
3.The Council of the European Union, which has intervened, is ordered to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 131 of 03.06.06, p. 50.