- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-357/21: Action brought on 25 June 2021 — Jose A. Alfonso Arpon v EUIPO — Puma (PLUMAflex by Roal)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0357
62021TN0357
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.8.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 329/38
(Case T-357/21)
(2021/C 329/51)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Jose A. Alfonso Arpon SL (Arnedo, Spain) (represented by: M. Escudero Pérez, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark PLUMAflex by Roal — Application for registration No 17 880 571
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 April 2021 in Case R 2991/2019-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(5)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.