I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Case C-410/14)
2014/C 409/41
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH
Defendant: DAK-Gesundheit
The following questions are referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union under Article 267 TFEU for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts … (1):
1.Does the concept of a ‘public contract’ under Article 1(2)(a) of Directive 2004/18/EC no longer apply if a contracting authority carries out an authorisation procedure in which it awards the contract without selecting one or more economic operators (‘openhouse model’)?
2.If the answer to question 1 is that the selection of one or more economic operators is a characteristic of a public contract, the following question arises: is the characteristic of the selection of economic operators within the meaning of Article 1(2)(a) of Directive 2004/18/EC to be interpreted, in the light of Article 2 of that directive, as meaning that contracting authorities may refrain from selecting one or more economic operators by way of an authorisation procedure only if the following conditions are satisfied:
— the carrying out of an authorisation procedure is published at European level,
— clear rules concerning the conclusion of the contract and acceding to the contract are set,
— the terms of the contract are set in advance in such a way that no economic operator is able to influence the content of the contract,
— economic operators are granted the right to accede to the contract at any time;
— the contracts concluded are published at European level?
(1)
OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114.
* * *