EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-509/21: Action brought on 18 August 2021 — IMG v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0509

62021TN0509

August 18, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

25.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/43

(Case T-509/21)

(2021/C 431/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: International Management Group (IMG) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi and J.-Y. de Cara, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

declare the present action admissible and well founded;

and, consequently,

annul the Commission decision of 8 June 2021 implementing the judgment of the Court of Justice of 31 January 2019 (Cases C-183/17 P and C-184/17 P), according to which the applicant is not eligible to implement Union funds under indirect management as an international organisation pursuant to the applicable financial rules;

order the defendant to pay compensation in respect of material and non-material damage;

order the defendant to pay all of the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 266 TFEU. In that regard, the applicant relies on an infringement of the force of res judicata of the judgment of the Court of Justice of 31 January 2019.

2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of good administration and of the duty of diligence on the grounds of infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

3.Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of legal certainty.

4.Fourth plea in law, in which the applicant alleges that the decision is vitiated by errors in law and manifest errors of assessment.

5.Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to have its affairs handled within a reasonable time.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia