I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for a figurative EU trade mark representing a rooster - Earlier figurative EU trade mark FFF - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/1107)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Kokito I Punt, SL (Gandia, Spain) (represented by: P. Bauzá Martínez, J. Gallego Jiménez, Y. Hernández Viñes and E. Sanz Valls, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Fédération française de football (Paris, France) (represented by: C. Bertheux Scotte, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 December 2023 (Case R 901/2023-4).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Kokito I Punt, SL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Fédération française de football;
3.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.
—
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1107/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—