EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Alber delivered on 25 June 1998. # Commission of the European Communities v Ireland. # Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 94/26/EC - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period. # Case C-26/98.

ECLI:EU:C:1998:328

61998CC0026

June 25, 1998
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Important legal notice

61998C0026

European Court reports 1998 Page I-06393

Opinion of the Advocate-General

1 In this action against Ireland for failure to fulfil obligations, the Commission asks the Court to

- declare that, by failing to notify the laws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 94/26/EC (1) of 15 June 1994 adapting to technical progress Council Directive 79/196/EEC (2) on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning electrical equipment for use in potentially explosive atmospheres employing certain types of protection, or by failing to adopt the measures necessary to comply with it, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

- order Ireland to pay the costs.

2 Directive 94/26 adapting Directive 79/196 to technical progress, adopted on 15 June 1994, entered into force, in accordance with Article 3 thereof, 20 days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities on 24 June 1994. Under Article 2 of the directive, Member States were obliged to bring into force the necessary provisions in order to comply with the directive by 31 March 1995.

3 Despite the Commission's letter of formal notice of 2 August 1995 and the reasoned opinion of 30 September 1996, Ireland did not comply with that obligation within the period of two months prescribed in the reasoned opinion.

4 In its defence, the Irish Government stated that the necessary legislative action was intended and might be completed by the time of the hearing in these proceedings. The parties both then agreed to dispense with a hearing, however, so that the Court decided to give judgment without holding a hearing.

5 The alleged failure to fulfil obligations is beyond doubt, and I therefore propose that judgment be given against Ireland, in accordance with the form of order sought.

(1) - OJ 1994 L 157, p. 33.

(2) - Of 6 February 1979, OJ 1979 L 43, p. 29.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia