I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Staff - Officials - Previous complaint - Defect - Time-limit for instituting proceedings - Lateness - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2008/C 223/117)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Bart Nijs (Béreldange, Luxembourg) (represented initially by: F. Rollinger; subsequently by: F. Rollinger and A. Hertzog, lawyers)
Defendant: Court of Auditors of the European Communities (represented by: T. Kennedy, J.-M. Stenier and G. Corstens, acting as Agents)
Annulment, on the one hand, of the decision of the Appointing Authority of 5 September 2007 to demote the applicant to Grade AD9, step 5, following a disciplinary procedure and, on the other, of the decisions to suspend him from his post, to open an administrative enquiry with regard to him and not to promote him to Grade AD 11 in 2007 — Claim for compensation for non-material and material harm
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.Mr Nijs is ordered to pay all the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 79, 29.3.2008, p. 37.