- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-440/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — TM v ECB (Civil service — ECB staff — Recruitment — Vacancy notice — Procedure for filling a post of [confidential information redacted] — Selection criteria — Professional experience — Rejection of application — Appointment of another candidate — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Interests of the service — Liability — Material and non-material damage)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0440
62021TA0440
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 63/40
(Case T-440/21)
(Civil service - ECB staff - Recruitment - Vacancy notice - Procedure for filling a post of [confidential information redacted] - Selection criteria - Professional experience - Rejection of application - Appointment of another candidate - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Misuse of powers - Interests of the service - Liability - Material and non-material damage)
(2023/C 63/50)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: TM (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: B. Ehlers and D. Nessaf, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
By his action under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the applicant seeks (i) annulment of the decision of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 15 December 2020 not to appoint him to the position of [confidential information redacted] but to appoint [confidential information redacted] to that position, and (ii) compensation for the material and non-material damage which he claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders TM to pay the costs.
(1)
OJ C 391, 27.9.2021.