- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-351/24, C/C: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Veszprémi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 15 May 2024 – C/C Vámügynöki Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0351
62024CN0351
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/4449
22.7.2024
(Case C-351/24, C/C)
(C/2024/4449)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: C/C Vámügynöki Kft.
Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága
Question referred
Must Article 119(3) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (1) be interpreted as precluding a national practice whereby a proof of origin is declared to be incorrect without recourse to the procedure laid down in Article 32 of Appendix I to the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin?
Language of the case: Hungarian
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4449/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* Language of the case: Hungarian.
* * *
(C/2024/4449)