EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-455/16 P: Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2017 — Fernández González v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Temporary staff — Recruitment — Employment of temporary staff in permanent posts — Plea of illegality — Error of law)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TA0455

62016TA0455

March 15, 2017
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

8.5.2017

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/42

(Case T-455/16 P) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)

((Appeal - Civil service - Temporary staff - Recruitment - Employment of temporary staff in permanent posts - Plea of illegality - Error of law))

(2017/C 144/56)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Elia Fernández González (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld and É. Boigelot, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Bersheid, Agents, and, initially, D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, and subsequently A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 14 June 2016, Fernández González v Commission (F-121/15, EU:F:2016:128), and seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 14 June 2016, Fernández González v Commission (F-121/15, EU:F:2016:128);

2.Refers the case to a Chamber of the General Court other than that which has ruled on the present appeal;

3.Reserves the costs.

(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2017144EN.01004201-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017144EN.01004201-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 383, 17.10.2016.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia