I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-197/12) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark METRO - Earlier Community figurative mark GRUPOMETROPOLIS - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Right to a fair hearing - Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms - Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2013/C 252/48
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. Carbonell Callicó, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 March 2012 (Case R 2440/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones, SL and MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones, SL to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 209, 14.7.2012.