- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-297/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 March 2019 — Wirecard Technologies v EUIPO — Striatum Ventures (supr) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark supr — Earlier Benelux word mark Zupr — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 60(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0297
62018TA0297
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 148/51
(Case T-297/18) (*)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark supr - Earlier Benelux word mark Zupr - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 60(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2019/C 148/49)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Wirecard Technologies GmbH (Aschheim, Germany) (represented by: A. Bayer, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Bonne and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Striatum Ventures BV (’s-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands) (represented by: G. Van den Hout, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 February 2018 (Case R 2028/2017-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Striatum Ventures and Wirecard Technologies.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Wirecard Technologies GmbH to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
OJ C 240,9.7.2018.