EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-117/24: Action brought on 24 February 2024 – CQ v EESC

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0117

62024TN0117

February 24, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/2775

29.4.2024

(Case T-117/24)

(C/2024/2775)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: CQ (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the decision of 5 May 2023 to reject the applicant’s request for assistance, submitted on 15 January 2020;

order payment of compensation for the non-material damage assessed on an ex aequo et bono basis at EUR 60 000;

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘the Staff Regulations’) and infringement of EESC Decision No 200/14 A concerning the procedures for preventing and dealing with psychological and sexual harassment at work within the Secretariat of the EESC and Decision No 635/05 A of 7 December 2005 laying down general implementing provisions governing disciplinary procedures and administrative investigations.

2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 12a of the Staff Regulations, the infringement of EESC Decision No 200/14 A and an error of assessment.

3.Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the procedural guarantees set out in Article 41 of the Charter and infringement of the reasonable time principle.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2775/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia