- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-345/20: Action brought on 4 June 2020 — Robert Klingel v EUIPO (MEN+)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0345
62020TN0345
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.7.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 247/46
(Case T-345/20)
(2020/C 247/63)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Robert Klingel OHG (Pforzheim, Germany) (represented by M. Zick, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union trade mark ‘MEN+’ — Application No 17 985 949
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 March 2020 in Case R 1906/2019-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision, in so far as the applicant is adversely affected;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Art. 7(1)(b), in particular read in conjunction with Art. 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.