- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-762/23, Curtea de Apel București: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 12 December 2023 – RL, QN, MR, JT, VS, AX v Curtea de Apel București
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0762
62023CN0762
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/2724
29.4.2024
(Case C-762/23, Curtea de Apel București)
(C/2024/2724)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellants: RL, QN, MR, JT, VS, AX
Respondent: Curtea de Apel București
Intervening party: Consiliul Național pentru Combaterea Discriminării
Question referred
Must the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU (read in conjunction with Article 2 TEU) be interpreted as meaning that the principle of judicial independence precludes the repeal, in respect of Romanian judges with 20 consecutive years’ service in the judiciary, of the right to receive, on retirement or on termination of service for other reasons not attributable to them, a sum equal to seven gross monthly seniority allowances, in the event that the exercise of that right to remuneration is suspended prior to repeal, on a continuous basis and for a prolonged period, for reasons connected principally to the need to eliminate an excessive budget deficit (the legislature expressly invokes the threshold of 3% of gross domestic product laid down in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)?
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2724/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
—