EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-619/23, Ronos: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-Oblast (Bulgaria) lodged on 6 October 2023 — ‘Ronos’ OOD, MA, TI v Komisia za zashtita na konkurentsiata

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0619

62023CN0619

October 6, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2023/1294

11.12.2023

(Case C-619/23, Ronos)

(C/2023/1294)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: ‘Ronos’ OOD, MA, TI

Defendant: Komisia za zashtita na konkurentsiata

Questions referred

1.Is Article 6 of Directive (EU) 2019/1 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018, read in conjunction with Article 3 thereof, and in the light of Article 4(2) of the Treaty on European Union, to be interpreted as limiting the powers of a national competition authority, when conducting an inspection, to access private correspondence, the inviolability of which is guaranteed by the Member State’s constitution, when the grounds for restricting the right to freedom and confidentiality of correspondence, enshrined in the constitution itself, are not in place?

2.Is Article 6 of Directive (EU) 2019/1 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018, read in conjunction with Article 3 thereof, and in the light of Article 4(2) of the Treaty on European Union, to be interpreted as meaning that, when an inspection is conducted by the national competition authority, a person who is asked to provide access to a data carrier is entitled to refuse access to content which forms part of his or her private correspondence, given that the inviolability of private correspondence is guaranteed by the Member State’s constitution and that the grounds for restricting the right to freedom and confidentiality of correspondence and other communications, enshrined in the constitution itself, are not in place?

(1) Directive (EU) 2019/1 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 to empower the competition authorities of the Member States to be more effective enforcers and to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market (OJ 2019 L 11, p. 3).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1294/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia