I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2013/C 252/52
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Pure Fishing, Inc. (Spirit Lake, United States) (represented by: J. Dickerson, Solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Edward Łabowicz (Kłodzko, Poland)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Board of Appeal in case no R1241/2012-2;
—Authorize for registration CTM application no 9611872; and
—Order the defendant to pay the costs of the action.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘NANOFIL’ for goods in class 28 — Community trade mark application No 9 611 872
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration of the figurative mark ‘NANO’ for goods in class 28
Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.