- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-444/23: Action brought on 31 July 2023 — Certinvest v EUIPO — Kiddinx Studios (Tina)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0444
62023TN0444
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.9.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 321/69
(Case T-444/23)
(2023/C 321/78)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Certinvest SRL (Păntăşeşti, Romania) (represented by: I. Speciac, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kiddinx Studios GmbH (Berlin, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark Tina — Application for registration No 18 271 155
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 May 2023 in Case R 1979/2022-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in the sense of allowing the appeal filed by the applicant against the decision of the Opposition Division and, consequently, oblige EUIPO to continue the registration proceedings for the trade mark at issue for all goods and services.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.