I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-400/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Interpretation of national law - National insolvency proceedings - Possibility for the insolvency judge to determine his or her substantive jurisdiction and the claim - Purely internal dispute - Lack of connection with EU law - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
(2022/C 84/26)
Language of the case: Romanian
Insolvency debtor: Asociaţia Naţională de Terapii Complementare din România (ANATECOR)
Intervening parties: Primăria Municipiului Arad — Direcția Venituri, Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Timișoara — Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Arad
The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Tribunalul Arad (Regional Court, Arad, Romania) by decision of 31 May 2021.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) Date lodged: 28.6.2021.