EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-329/20: Order of the General Court of 25 October 2021 — 4B Company v EUIPO — Deenz (Pendant (jewellery)) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a pendant (jewellery) — Maintenance of the Community design in an amended form — Article 25(6) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TB0329

62020TB0329

October 25, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 513/27

(Case T-329/20) (*)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a pendant (jewellery) - Maintenance of the Community design in an amended form - Article 25(6) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 513/40)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: 4B Company Srl (Montegiorgio, Italy) (represented by: G. Brogi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Scardocchia and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Deenz Holding Ltd (Dubai, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: N. Alberti, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 March 2020 (Case R 2449/2018-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between 4B Company and Deenz Holding.

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed.

2.4B Company Srl shall pay the costs.

(*)

Language of the case: Italian

* * *

(1) OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia