- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-79/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 May 2015 — Gyarmathy v EMCDDA (Civil service — EMCDDA staff — Temporary staff — Decision not to renew a contract of employment — Psychological harassment — Request for assistance — Administrative inquiry — Judgment by default — Examination of the admissibility of the application — Act adversely affecting the applicant — Inadmissibility — Allocation of costs)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013FA0079
62013FA0079
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.6.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 213/42
(Case F-79/13) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Civil service - EMCDDA staff - Temporary staff - Decision not to renew a contract of employment - Psychological harassment - Request for assistance - Administrative inquiry - Judgment by default - Examination of the admissibility of the application - Act adversely affecting the applicant - Inadmissibility - Allocation of costs))
(2015/C 213/68)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Valéria Anna Gyarmathy (Györ, Hungary) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)
Defendant: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) (represented by: D. Storti and F. Pereyra, acting as Agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
Application for annulment, first, of the decision rejecting the applicant’s request seeking recognition of the fact that she had been the victim of psychological harassment on the part of her line manager and, secondly, of the decision not to renew her contract and, as a result, an application for a new investigation to be conducted and for damages in respect of the material and non-material harm allegedly suffered.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Declares that the parties shall bear their own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 31, 1/2/2014, p. 22.