I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
‛(Appeal — Actions for annulment — Admissibility — Determination of the subject-matter of the proceedings — Financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector for the period 2014-2020 — Call for proposals — Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) — Email informing the appellant of the rejection of its proposal — Subsequent decision of the European Commission establishing the list of selected proposals — Effective judicial protection)’
Language of the case: English
Appellant: Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor BV (represented by: Y. de Vries, advocaat)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Samnadda and J. Hottiaux, acting as Agents)
The Court:
1.Sets aside the order of the General Court of 11 October 2016, Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor v Commission (T-564/15, not published, EU:T:2016:611);
2.Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;
3.Reserves the costs.
(1) OJ C 70, 6.3.2017.