I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2022/C 84/71)
Language of the case: Polish
Applicant: Olimp Laboratories sp. z o.o. (Dębica, Poland) (represented by: M. Kondrat, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark VITA-MIN MULTIPLE SPORT — Application No 18 115 249
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 November 2021 in Case R 771/2020-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and remit the case to EUIPO for further consideration;
—amend the contested decision by declaring that, in relation to the mark ‘VITA-MIN MULTIPLE SPORT’ applied for in respect of goods in Class 5 of the Nice Agreement, there is no absolute ground for refusal, pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of [Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark], based on the sign’s lack of any distinctive character or its descriptive character;
—make an appropriate order as to costs.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 103(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations and the principle of legal certainty.