I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Dumping - Imports of birch plywood originating in Russia - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1930 - Objective examination - Post-investigation period - Market segmentation - Other injury factors - Article 3(2), (6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 - Equal treatment - Union interest - Article 21 of Regulation 2016/1036 - Rights of the defence)
(C/2024/6424)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Vyatsky Plywood Mill OOO (Kirov, Russia) (represented by: M. Krestiyanova and N. Tuominen, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo, R. Pethke and J. Zieliński, acting as Agents)
Interveners in support of the defendant: Latvijas Finieris AS (Riga, Latvia), Paged Pisz sp. z o.o. (Pisz, Poland) (represented by: S. Ross, lawyer)
By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1930 of 8 November 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of birch plywood originating in Russia (OJ 2021 L 394, p. 7).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Vyatsky Plywood Mill OOO to pay the costs.
—
(1)
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6424/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *