- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-482/23: Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2024 – Qozgar v EUIPO – L’Oréal (CLEOPATRA) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark CLEOPATRA – Earlier EU word mark CLEOPATRA – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA0482
62023TA0482
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/556
(Case T-482/23)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark CLEOPATRA - Earlier EU word mark CLEOPATRA - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/556)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Afaaq Ahmad Qozgar (Thiruvananthapuram, India) (represented by: L. Pivec, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: L’Oréal (Paris, France) (represented by: T. de Haan and S. Vandezande, lawyers)
Re:
By his action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 June 2023 (Case R 2509/2022-5).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Afaaq Ahmad Qozgar to pay the costs.
—
OJ C C/2023/31, 9.10.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/556/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—