EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-626/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 11 October 2021 — Funke Sp. zo.o.

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CN0626

62021CN0626

October 11, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

24.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/13

(Case C-626/21)

(2022/C 37/18)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant on a point of law: Funke Sp. zo.o.

Defendant authority before the Verwaltungsgericht Wien (Austria): Landespolizeidirektion Wien

Questions referred

Are

Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 and Regulation (EC) No 596/2009, in particular Article 12 and Annex II,

Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93, in particular Articles 20 and 22, and

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/417 of 8 November 2018 laying down guidelines for the management of the European Union Rapid Information System ‘RAPEX’ established under Article 12 of Directive 2001/95/EC on general product safety and its notification system to be interpreted as meaning that

the right of an economic operator to complete a RAPEX notification arises directly from those provisions?

the European Commission is competent to decide on such a request?

the authority of the Member State concerned is competent to decide on such a request?

(If Question 3 is answered in the affirmative)

the (national) judicial protection against such a decision is sufficient where it is not afforded to everyone but only to the economic operator affected by the (obligatory) measure against the (obligatory) measure taken by the authority?

Language of the case: German

* * *

(1) OJ 2002 L 11, p. 4.

(2) Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93 (OJ 2008 L 218, p. 30).

(3) Regulation (EC) No 596/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 adapting a number of instruments subject to the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty to Council Decision 1999/468/EC with regard to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny — Adaptation to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny — Part Four (OJ 2009 L 188, p. 14).

(4) OJ 2019 L 73, p. 121.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia