EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-503/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 19 September 2013 — Boston Scientific Medizintechnik GmbH v AOK Sachsen-Anhalt

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CN0503

62013CN0503

September 19, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

30.11.2013

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/8

(Case C-503/13)

2013/C 352/14

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant on a point of law: Boston Scientific Medizintechnik GmbH

Respondent on a point of law: AOK Sachsen-Anhalt

Questions referred

1.Is Article 6(1) of Council Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products to be interpreted as meaning that a product in the form of a medical device implanted in the human body (in this case, a pacemaker) is already defective if devices in the same product group have a significantly increased risk of failure, but a defect has not been detected in the device which has been implanted in the specific case in point?

2.If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative: Do the costs of the operation to remove the product and implant another pacemaker constitute damage caused by personal injury for the purposes of Article 1 and point (a) of the first sentence of Article 9 of Directive 85/374/EEC?

Language of the case: German

(1) OJ 1985 L 210, p. 29

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia