- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-57/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 30 January 2018 — AX v BW
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0057
62018CN0057
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 152/11
(Case C-57/18)
(2018/C 152/12)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: AX
Defendant: BW
Questions referred
1.Must point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 1(1) of Directive 98/59/EC of the Council of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies (1) be interpreted as meaning that, for the purposes of determining the number of workers normally employed in an establishment, regard is to be had to the number of workers employed in the usual course of business at the time of the redundancy?
2.Must point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 1(1) of Directive 98/59/EC be interpreted as meaning that, for the purposes of determining the number of workers normally employed in a user undertaking’s business, account may be taken of temporary agency workers employed there?
If the answer to the second question is in the affirmative:
3.Which conditions apply to the taking into account of temporary agency workers for the purposes of determining the number of workers normally employed in a user undertaking’s business?
(1) OJ L 225, p. 16.
* * *