EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Rectification order of 22 November 2018.#Republic of Cyprus v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Rectification.#Case T-825/16.

ECLI:EU:T:2018:844

62016TO0825

November 22, 2018
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

ORDER OF THE GENERAL COURT (Second Chamber)

22 November 2018 (*1)

(Rectification)

In Case T-825/16,

Republic of Cyprus, represented by S. Malynicz QC and V. Marsland, Solicitor,

applicant,

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by D. Gája, acting as Agent,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, and intervener before the General Court, being

Papouis Dairies Ltd, established in Nicosia (Cyprus), represented by N. Korogiannakis, lawyer,

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 September 2016 (Case R 2065/2014-4), relating to opposition proceedings between the Republic of Cyprus and Papouis Dairies,

THE GENERAL COURT (Second Chamber),

composed of M. Prek, President, F. Schalin (Rapporteur) and M. J. Costeira, Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

makes the following

1The Court delivered the judgment of 13 July 2018, Cyprus v EUIPO – Papouis Dairies (Pallas Halloumi), (T-825/16, EU:T:2018:482).

2In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, it is necessary to rectify, in the version in the language of the case, a clerical mistake found in the object of that judgment.

On those grounds,

THE GENERAL COURT (Second Chamber) hereby orders:

The paragraph in which the object is contained should be read as follows:

‘ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 September 2016 (Case R 2065/2014-4), relating to opposition proceedings between the Republic of Cyprus and Papouis Dairies,’

instead of

‘ACTION brought against an appeal brought before the Fourth Chamber of the Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 September 2016 (Case R 2065/2014-4), relating to opposition proceedings between the Republic of Cyprus and Papouis Dairies,’.

Luxembourg, 22 November 2018.

Registrar

President

*1 Language of the case: English.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia