EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-777/23 P: Appeal brought on 14 December 2023 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 27 September 2023 in Joined Cases T-12/15, T-158/15 and T-258/15, Banco Santander and Others v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0777

62023CN0777

December 14, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/1541

26.2.2024

(Case C-777/23 P)

(C/2024/1541)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky, C. Urraca Caviedes and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Banco Santander, SA and Santusa Holding, SL

Abertis Infraestructuras, SA and Abertis Telecom Satélites, SA,

Axa Mediterranean Holding, SA

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court of Justice should:

annul the judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2023 in Joined Cases Banco Santander and Others v European Commission (T-12/15, T-158/15 and T-258/15, EU:T:2023:583);

dismiss the actions for annulment in Cases T-12/15 (Banco Santander and Santusa v Commission), T-158/15 (Abertis Infraestructuras and Abertis Telecom Satélites v Commission) and T-258/15 (Axa Mediterranean Holding v Commission);

order the applicants at first instance to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in respect of both the proceedings at first instance and the present appeal.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

The appellant relies on three grounds of appeal and submits that the General Court made the following errors of law:

Error of law as to the scope of the initial decisions in that it failed to take into account the information provided by the Member State (first ground of appeal);

Error of law as to the relevance of a binding administrative practice in that it held that it could not extend the scope of an aid scheme (second ground of appeal); and

Error of law in the interpretation and application of the principle of legitimate expectations to the aid scheme at issue (third ground of appeal).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1541/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia