- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-687/22, Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria (Exclusion of claims governed by public law from discharge of debt): Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Alicante - Spain) – Julieta, Rogelio v Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Directive (EU) 2019/1023 – Procedures concerning restructuring, insolvency and discharge of debt – Article 20 – Access to discharge – Article 20(1) – Full discharge of debt – Article 23 – Derogations – Article 23(4) – Exclusion of certain categories of debt from the discharge of debt – Exclusion of claims governed by public law – Justification under national law – Legal effects of directives – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0687
62022CA0687
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/3281
(Case C-687/22, (1) Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria (Exclusion of claims governed by public law from discharge of debt))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Directive (EU) 2019/1023 - Procedures concerning restructuring, insolvency and discharge of debt - Article 20 - Access to discharge - Article 20(1) - Full discharge of debt - Article 23 - Derogations - Article 23(4) - Exclusion of certain categories of debt from the discharge of debt - Exclusion of claims governed by public law - Justification under national law - Legal effects of directives - Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law)
(C/2024/3281)
Language of the case: Spanish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Julieta, Rogelio
Defendant: Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria
Operative part of the judgment
1.The principle that national law must be interpreted in conformity with an EU directive is not applicable to a situation in which the facts occurred after the date of entry into force of Directive (EU) 2019/1023 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on preventive restructuring frameworks, on discharge of debt and disqualifications, and on measures to increase the efficiency of procedures concerning restructuring, insolvency and discharge of debt, and amending Directive (EU) 2017/1132 (Directive on restructuring and insolvency), but before the expiry of the deadline for transposition of that directive and its transposition into national law.
2.Article 23(4) of Directive 2019/1023 must be interpreted as meaning that the list of specific categories of debt set out therein is not exhaustive and that the Member States have the power to exclude specific categories of debt other than those listed in that provision from discharge of debt, provided that such an exclusion is duly justified under national law.
3.An interpretation by the national courts of national legislation applicable to facts which occurred after the date of entry into force of Directive 2019/1023, but before the expiry of the deadline for its transposition, in accordance with which interpretation the exclusion of claims governed by public law from discharge of debt is not duly justified in that legislation, is not liable seriously to compromise, after the expiry of that deadline, the attainment of the objective pursued by that directive.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3281/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—