I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2019/C 312/35)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Heitec AG (Erlangen, Germany) (represented by: G. Wagner, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hetec Datensysteme GmbH (Germering, Germany)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark HEITEC — EU trade mark No 774 331
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 April 2019 in Case R 1171/2018-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in conjunction with Rule 22(3) and (4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95.