- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-412/25: Action brought on 27 June 2025 – Parkster v EUIPO – Ühisteenused (PARKNER)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025TN0412
62025TN0412
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/4477
18.8.2025
(Case T-412/25)
(C/2025/4477)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Parkster AB (Lund, Sweden) (represented by: J. Norderyd, C. Sundén and J. Nilsson, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ühisteenused AS (Tallinn, Estonia)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark PARKNER – Application for registration No 18 778 658
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 May 2025 in Case R 1944/2024-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs;
—not order the applicant to pay the costs of the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, which should be ordered to pay the costs of the applicant before the Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4477/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—