I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
—
(2019/C 337/17)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Perfect Bar LLC (San Diego, California, United States) (represented by: F. Miazzetto, J. Gracia Albero, R. Seoane Lacayo and E. Cebollero González, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark PERFECT BAR – Application for registration No 15 374 085
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 May 2019 in Case R 371/2019-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs derived from the procedure before the General Court and the EUIPO.
—Infringement of Art 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and of Article 296 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;
—Infringement of Art 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Art 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Art 7(1)(b) of Regulation EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—