I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2016/C 222/41)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Interbank Deposit Protection Fund (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Siragusa, G. Scassellati Sforzolini and G. Faella, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul European Commission Decision C(2015) 9526 final of 23 December 2015 on the State aid SA.39451 (2015/C) (ex 2015/NN);
—in the alternative, annul that decision in so far as it concerns the assessment and classification of the aid element inherent in measure 3;
—order the Commission to pay the costs;
—order any other measure, including any measure of inquiry, which it deems appropriate.
The decision contested in the present action is the same one contested in Case T-98/16, Italy v Commission, and Case T-196/16, Banca Tercas v Commission.
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in those two cases.