- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-660/13: Action brought on 12 December 2013 — Czech Republic v European Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TN0660
62013TN0660
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.2.2014
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 45/41
(Case T-660/13)
2014/C 45/71
Language of the case: Czech
Parties
Applicant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, J. Vláčil, Agents)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul in its entirety Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 886/2013 of 15 May 2013 supplementing Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to data and procedures for the provision, where possible, of road safety-related minimum universal traffic information free of charge to users (OJ 2013 L 247, p. 6) and
—order the European Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.
In the alternative, the applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul Article 5(1), Article 9 and Article 10(1)(a) of the contested regulation, and
—order the European Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on 3 pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 7(1) of Directive No 2010/40/EU (1) in conjunction with Article 5(1) and Article 6 thereof In this connection, the applicant states that the Commission, by adopting the contested regulation, exceeded the limits of the authority laid down by Article 7(1) of Directive No 2010/40, in conjunction with Article 5(1) and Article 6 thereof.
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 209 TFEU In this plea, the applicant claims that the Commission, by the adoption of the contested regulation, exceeded its delegated power to adopt non-legislative acts pursuant to Article 290 TFEU.
3.Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 13(2) TEU In this regard, the applicant submits that the Commission, by the adoption of the contested regulation, exceeded the limits of the powers conferred on it in the Treaties.
(1) Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on the framework for the deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems in the field of road transport and for interfaces with other modes of transport (OJ 2010 L 207, p. 1).