I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2015/C 073/27)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: La Chaine hôtelière La Frontière, Shotef SPRL (represented by: J. Steyt, avocat)
Defendant: European Commission
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Declare the present application to be admissible and well founded;
Consequently:
—primarily, authorise the applicant to maintain and continue the attachment order already served and to serve other attachment orders on the European Union/European Commission for all sums, funds, assets or objects generally that it has or will subsequently have in its possession, owes or will subsequently owe for any reason and on any grounds whatever to the Democratic Republic of Congo;
—in the alternative, authorise the applicant to maintain and continue the attachment order already served and to serve other attachment orders on the European Union/European Commission for all sums, funds, assets or objects generally that it has or will subsequently have in its possession, owes or will subsequently owe on the basis of a private contract to the Democratic Republic of Congo;
In any event:
—order the European Commission to pay the costs.