- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-87/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative (Luxembourg) lodged on 20 February 2012 — Kreshnik Ymerag, Kasim Ymeraga, Afijete Ymeraga-Tafarshiku, Kushtrim Ymeraga, Labinot Ymeraga v Minister for Labour, Employment and Immigration
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012CN0087
62012CN0087
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 138/3
(Case C-87/12)
(2012/C 138/05)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Kreshnik Ymerag, Kasim Ymeraga, Afijete Ymeraga-Tafarshiku, Kushtrim Ymeraga, Labinot Ymeraga
Defendant: Minister for Labour, Employment and Immigration
Question referred
To what extent does the fact of being a citizen of the Union and the related right to reside in the country of which a Union citizen is a national, as provided for by Article 20 of the TFEU, along with the rights, guarantees and obligations laid down in the Charter of Fundamental Rights and in particular and insofar as is relevant, in Articles 20, 21, 24, 33 and 34, confer a right to family reunification upon a sponsor who is a citizen of the Union and wishes to bring about, in the country in which he resides and of which he holds the nationality, the reunification with himself of his mother and father and two of his brothers, all of whom are third-country nationals, where he has not exercised his right to free movement and has not resided in a Member State other than that of which he holds the nationality?