- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-722/13: Order of the General Court of 17 July 2014 — The Directv Group v OHIM — Bolloré (DIRECTV) (Community trade mark — Application for revocation — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TB0722
62013TB0722
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 361/8
(Case T-722/13) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Community trade mark - Application for revocation - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate))
2014/C 361/09
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: The Directv Group, Inc. (El Segundo, United States) (represented by: F. Valentin, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Bolloré (Ergué Gabéric, France) (represented by: S. Legrand, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 October 2013 (Case R 1960/2012-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Bolloré and The Directv Group, Inc.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The applicant is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those of the defendant and the intervener.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 112, 14.4.2014.