I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2014/C 194/40
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Warenhandelszentrum Ltd. (Neu-Ulm, Germany) (represented by: F. Hirschel, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Baumarkt Max Bahr GmbH & Co. KG (Hamburg, Germany)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 January 2014 in case R 2035/2012-1 and allow the applicant’s trade mark applied for;
—order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Applicant
Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark, containing the word elements ‘NEW MAX’, for goods and services in Classes 3, 5 and 37 — Community trade mark application No 1 0 1 06 474
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Baumarkt Max Bahr GmbH & Co. KG
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative mark, containing the word element ‘MAX’, for services in Class 35
Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the decision of the Opposition Division and complete rejection of the trade mark applied for
Pleas in law: There is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue