I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-552/10 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Dumping - Regulation (EC) No 121/2006 - Imports of steel ropes and cables originating, inter alia, in India - Decision 2006/38/EC - Regulation (EC) No 384/96 - Article 8(9) - Undertakings offered in connection with anti-dumping proceedings)
2013/C 26/03
Language of the case: English
Appellant: Usha Martin Ltd (represented by: V. Akritidis and E. Petritsi, dikigoroï, and by F. Crespo, avocat)
Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen, acting as Agent, G. Berrisch, Rechtsanwalt, and N. Chesaites, Barrister), European Commission (represented by T. Scharf and S. Thomas, acting as Agents)
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2010 in Case T-119/06: Usha Martin Ltd v Council of the European Union and European Commission in which the General Court dismissed an action, on the one hand, for annulment of Commission Decision of 22 December 2005 amending Commission Decision 1999/572/EC accepting undertakings in connection with the anti-dumping proceedings concerning imports of steel wire rope and cables originating in, inter alia, India (OJ 2006 L 22, p. 54) and, on the other hand, for annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 121/2006 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1858/2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of steel ropes and cables originating in, inter alia, India (OJ 2006 L 22, p. 1)
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Usha Martin Ltd to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 55, 19.2.2011.