I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Appeals – Order of the Court of First Instance – Actions for failure to act – Complaints of alleged failure to act by a Member State – Commission not taking a position – Appeal manifestly inadmissible
Appeals – Grounds – Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the Court of First Instance – Error of law relied on not identified – Inadmissible (Art. 225 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, para. 1; Rules of Procedure of the Court, Art. 112(1)(c)) (see paras 15-17)
Appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 14 December 2006 in Case T-150/06 Smanor and Others v Commission whereby the Court of First Instance dismissed as inadmissible the action by the applicants for: (1) a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to act by not taking a position on the complaints which they had lodged in 1986 against the French Republic; and (2) an order for suspension of operation of a judgment and of a decision taken by the national authorities.
The appeal is dismissed.
Smanor SA and Mr & Mrs Ségaud are ordered to bear their own costs.