- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-575/08: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — 4care v OHIM — Laboratorios Diafarm (Acumed) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Acumed — Earlier national word mark AQUAMED ACTIVE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TA0575
62008TA0575
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.10.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 288/37
(Case T-575/08) (*)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Acumed - Earlier national word mark AQUAMED ACTIVE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Similarity of the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2010/C 288/70)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: 4care AG (Kiel, Germany) (represented by: S. Redeker and M. Diesbach, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Laboratorios Diafarm, SA (Barberà del Vallès, Spain) (represented by: E. Sugrañes Coca, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 October 2008 (Case R 1636/2007-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Laboratorios Diafarm, SA and 4care AG.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders 4care AG to pay the costs.
(*)
OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.