I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2016/C 118/40)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Applicant: Chanel SAS (Neuilly-sur-Seine, France) (represented by: C. Sueiras Villalobos, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Li Jing Zhou (Fuenlabrada, Spain) and Golden Rose 999 Srl (Rome, Italy)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: Community design representation of an ornament — Community Design No 1 689 027-0001
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 November 2015 in Case R 2346/2014-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—declare the contested design invalid;
—order EUIPO, and any other parties or interveners liable to appear in the present proceedings in support of the contested decision, to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Articles 5 and 6 of Regulation No 6/2002.