- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-746/19: Action brought on 5 November 2019 – GY v ECB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0746
62019TN0746
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.2.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 36/33
—
(Case T-746/19)
(2020/C 36/41)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: GY (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the ECB’s decision of 28 January 2019 refusing the applicant the household allowance for the year 2019;
—annul further, if need be, the decisions of 24 April 2019 and 26 August 2019 respectively rejecting the applicant’s request for administrative review and the applicant’s grievance procedure;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law:
1.First plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of non-discrimination.
2.Second plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of acquired rights.
3.Third plea in law, alleging violation of the ‘effet utile’ of the household allowance and of Article 15 of the Conditions of Employment of the ECB.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of the duty of care.
—